I've made an account on IMDB.com, and have posted an message on the imdb message board, titled, 'What do you think?' Explaining how the ending of Cloverfield could have been different if the monster wasnt shown at the end.
I've only had one reply so far, from biglondog98, saying
'The montster was shown many times throughout the movie not just at the end eating hud. Also the mini parasite things were all over the place. If they took out all the scenes of the monster and the parasites then i suppose the movie could have been about anything destroying the city.
Thinking about how films can lead people onto believe that non-fiction is fiction
No comments:
Post a Comment